6 min read
Anesthesiology Residency Programs: Rankings, Tiers & Match Data (2026)
There is no official ranking of anesthesiology residency programs. Unlike medical schools, anesthesiology residency programs have no equivalent to...
/about_mega.jpg?width=500&height=500&name=about_mega.jpg)
MedEdits Medical Admissions is the nation's premier medical school admissions consulting firm. Since 2007, founder Jessica Freedman, M.D., and our team of physician educators have guided thousands of aspiring medical professionals through their premedical and medical school journey. Our faculty advisors bring invaluable insider knowledge from serving on medical school admissions committees, education committees, and hospital boards. Combined with our specialized medical admissions writing coaches, we provide the comprehensive guidance and industry expertise essential for acceptance to medical school, residency, and fellowship programs.
6 min read
There is no official ranking of dermatology residency programs. Unlike medical schools, which are ranked annually by U.S. News & World Report, residency programs have no equivalent. The rankings on this page reflect MedEdits analysis based on program reputation, NIH departmental funding, and median Step 2 CK scores of applicants who received interview invitations. They are intended to help applicants build a realistic, strategically balanced program list — not to make definitive judgments about training quality.
How to use this table.
Tier 1 programs are the most research-intensive and nationally recognized. They attract the strongest applicant pools and require near-perfect applications.
Tier 2 programs are strong academic programs that are competitive but reachable for well-prepared applicants.
Tier 3 programs are solid academic programs that belong on every applicant's list and are particularly important for applicants who need geographic flexibility or are building a longer rank list.
The Median Step 2 column reflects the median score of applicants who received interview invitations (not matched applicants) and should be used as a rough benchmark, not a cutoff.
N/A means the program does not publicly report this data.
| Rank | Program | Location | Tier | Median Step 2 (Interviewed) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — Most Competitive | ||||
| 1 | University of Pennsylvania | Philadelphia, PA | 1 | N/A |
| 2 | UCSF | San Francisco, CA | 1 | 254 |
| 3 | Harvard | Boston, MA | 1 | 261 |
| 4 | NYU Grossman | New York, NY | 1 | 260 |
| 5 | Yale | New Haven, CT | 1 | N/A |
| 6 | Stanford | Redwood City, CA | 1 | N/A |
| 7 | UT Southwestern | Dallas, TX | 1 | 258 |
| 8 | Northwestern (McGaw) | Chicago, IL | 1 | N/A |
| 9 | Mayo Clinic (Rochester) | Rochester, MN | 1 | 264 |
| 10 | Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai | New York, NY | 1 | N/A |
| 11 | University of Michigan | Ann Arbor, MI | 1 | 263 |
| 12 | Johns Hopkins | Baltimore, MD | 1 | 255 |
| 13 | Emory | Atlanta, GA | 1 | N/A |
| 14 | UCLA | Los Angeles, CA | 1 | N/A |
| 15 | Mayo Clinic (Arizona) | Scottsdale, AZ | 1 | 263 |
| 16 | Duke | Durham, NC | 1 | 259 |
| 17 | University of Miami Jackson | Miami, FL | 1 | N/A |
| 18 | Cornell (NYP) | New York, NY | 1 | 258 |
| 19 | Columbia (NYP) | New York, NY | 1 | 257 |
| 20 | UChicago | Chicago, IL | 1 | 259 |
| Tier 2 — Strong Academic Programs | ||||
| 21 | WashU Barnes-Jewish | St. Louis, MO | 2 | 258 |
| 22 | Cleveland Clinic | Cleveland, OH | 2 | 262 |
| 23 | Vanderbilt | Nashville, TN | 2 | 262 |
| 24 | University of Iowa | Iowa City, IA | 2 | 263 |
| 25 | Wake Forest | Winston-Salem, NC | 2 | 258 |
| 26 | University of Washington | Seattle, WA | 2 | 261 |
| 27 | Penn State (Hershey) | Hershey, PA | 2 | 258 |
| 28 | Baylor College of Medicine | Houston, TX | 2 | 258 |
| 29 | UCSD | La Jolla, CA | 2 | 256 |
| 30 | Thomas Jefferson University | Philadelphia, PA | 2 | 253 |
| 31 | Indiana University | Indianapolis, IN | 2 | 260 |
| 32 | University of Wisconsin | Madison, WI | 2 | 261 |
| 33 | University of Alabama (Birmingham) | Birmingham, AL | 2 | 261 |
| 34 | University of Nebraska | Omaha, NE | 2 | 263 |
| 35 | University of Minnesota | Minneapolis, MN | 2 | 257 |
| 36 | Medical College of Wisconsin | Milwaukee, WI | 2 | 257 |
| 37 | OHSU | Portland, OR | 2 | 257 |
| 38 | UC Davis | Sacramento, CA | 2 | 259 |
| 39 | Henry Ford Hospital | Detroit, MI | 2 | 257 |
| 40 | Brown University | Providence, RI | 2 | 259 |
| 41 | Case Western | Cleveland, OH | 2 | 258 |
| 42 | UNC Chapel Hill | Chapel Hill, NC | 2 | 258 |
| 43 | Montefiore Albert Einstein | Bronx, NY | 2 | 257 |
| 44 | UT HSC (Houston) | Houston, TX | 2 | 256 |
| 45 | University of Utah | Salt Lake City, UT | 2 | 257 |
| 46 | University of Florida | Gainesville, FL | 2 | N/A |
| 47 | Ohio State University | Columbus, OH | 2 | N/A |
| 48 | Mayo Clinic (Jacksonville) | Jacksonville, FL | 2 | N/A |
| 49 | UPMC | Pittsburgh, PA | 2 | N/A |
| 50 | Medical University of South Carolina | Charleston, SC | 2 | N/A |
| 51 | Tulane University | New Orleans, LA | 2 | 259 |
| 52 | University of Missouri-Columbia | Columbia, MO | 2 | 263 |
| 53 | USF Morsani | Tampa, FL | 2 | 262 |
| 54 | St. Louis University | St. Louis, MO | 2 | 262 |
| 55 | University of Cincinnati | Cincinnati, OH | 2 | N/A |
| 56 | Cook County Health | Chicago, IL | 2 | 261 |
| 57 | UC Irvine | Irvine, CA | 2 | 256 |
| 58 | University of Rochester | Rochester, NY | 2 | 259 |
| 59 | Rush University | Chicago, IL | 2 | 255 |
| 60 | Rutgers (RW Johnson) | Somerset, NJ | 2 | N/A |
| 61 | Geisinger | Danville, PA | 2 | N/A |
| 62 | University of Illinois (Chicago) | Chicago, IL | 2 | N/A |
| 63 | UVA | Charlottesville, VA | 2 | N/A |
| 64 | Dartmouth | Lebanon, NH | 2 | 255 |
| 65 | University of Colorado | Aurora, CO | 2 | N/A |
| Tier 3 — Solid Academic Programs | ||||
| 66 | Temple University | Philadelphia, PA | 3 | 253 |
| 67 | Boston University | Boston, MA | 3 | 256 |
| 68 | George Washington University | Washington, DC | 3 | N/A |
| 69 | Tufts | Boston, MA | 3 | N/A |
| 70 | SUNY Downstate | Brooklyn, NY | 3 | N/A |
| 71 | UMass | Worcester, MA | 3 | N/A |
| 72 | Howard University | Washington, DC | 3 | N/A |
| 73 | Wright State | Fairborn, OH | 3 | 254 |
| 74 | Southern Illinois University | Springfield, IL | 3 | 255 |
| 75 | UT Austin Dell | Austin, TX | 3 | 257 |
| 76 | Loyola | Maywood, IL | 3 | 257 |
| 77 | University of Louisville | Louisville, KY | 3 | N/A |
| 78 | University of Kansas | Kansas City, KS | 3 | 260 |
| 79 | University of Vermont | Burlington, VT | 3 | N/A |
| 80 | Zucker Hofstra (Northwell) | Manhasset, NY | 3 | N/A |
| 81 | HonorHealth | Scottsdale, AZ | 3 | 258 |
| 82 | Baylor Scott and White (Temple) | Temple, TX | 3 | 256 |
| 83 | University of Arizona (Tucson) | Tucson, AZ | 3 | 258 |
| 84 | University of Mississippi | Jackson, MS | 3 | N/A |
| 85 | UT HSC (San Antonio) | San Antonio, TX | 3 | N/A |
| 86 | University of Connecticut | Farmington, CT | 3 | N/A |
| 87 | LSU | New Orleans, LA | 3 | N/A |
| 88 | Texas Tech (Lubbock) | Lubbock, TX | 3 | N/A |
| 89 | Marshfield Clinic | Marshfield, WI | 3 | N/A |
| 90 | University of New Mexico | Albuquerque, NM | 3 | 249 |
| 91 | Wayne State | Dearborn, MI | 3 | 246 |
| 92 | Medical College of Georgia | Augusta, GA | 3 | N/A |
| 93 | Old Dominion University | Norfolk, VA | 3 | N/A |
| 94 | Case Western (MetroHealth) | Cleveland, OH | 3 | 256 |
| 95 | Baylor University Medical Center | Dallas, TX | 3 | N/A |
| 96 | Loma Linda | Loma Linda, CA | 3 | N/A |
| 97 | Kansas City University (ADCDS) | Maitland, FL | 3 | N/A |
| 98 | Trinity Health Livingston | Ypsilanti, MI | 3 | N/A |
| 99 | Carilion Clinic Virginia Tech | Roanoke, VA | 3 | N/A |
| 100 | HCA USF Morsani (St. Petersburg) | Largo, FL | 3 | N/A |

Tier 1 programs are the most selective dermatology residencies in the country. They recruit heavily from applicants at top-40 NIH-funded medical schools, expect substantial research portfolios — often 20 or more abstracts, presentations, and publications — and place significant weight on letters from well-known figures in the field. A gold signal to a Tier 1 program is a high-stakes decision. If your Step 2 CK score is at or above 257, your research output is strong, and you have a connection to the program through an away rotation or a faculty letter writer, a gold signal to a Tier 1 program is well-placed. If you are missing one or more of those elements, your gold signal will convert at a much lower rate than the 54% median.
Tier 2 programs are where most competitive applicants should concentrate the majority of their signals and applications. These are strong academic programs with rigorous training, active research, and excellent fellowship placement — and they recruit from a broader pool than Tier 1. A well-prepared applicant with a Step 2 CK score in the 255–262 range, solid research output, and a strong letter from a dermatologist has a genuine chance at many Tier 2 programs. This is also where away rotations can be most strategically valuable — a strong performance at a Tier 2 program often leads directly to an interview and a favorable rank position.
Tier 3 programs are solid academic programs that every applicant should include on their list. The single biggest behavioral difference between matched and unmatched dermatology applicants in 2024 was rank list length — matched applicants ranked an average of 8.8 programs versus 4.5 for unmatched applicants. Tier 3 programs are how you build that list. They offer real dermatology training, produce fellows and academic faculty, and match applicants every year who did not have the research portfolio or school pedigree to compete at the top tier. Do not treat them as fallbacks — treat them as essential components of a complete application strategy.
Dermatology gives you 3 gold signals and 25 silver signals (28 total). How you allocate these signals is one of the most consequential decisions in your application. Programs virtually never interview unsignaled applicants, and gold signals convert to interview invitations at a median rate of 54% compared to 14% for silver signals.
Use this table as a starting framework, but do not allocate signals based on rank alone. The most effective signal strategy is built around three questions:
Am I genuinely competitive based on my Step 2 score, research output, and medical school?
Do I have a real connection such as an away rotation, a faculty letter writer, or a geographic tie?
Would I actually be happy to train at this program?
Your 3 gold signals should go to programs where the answer to all three questions is yes. Your silver signals should cover a mix of Tier 1 and Tier 2 programs where you are competitive, plus enough Tier 3 programs to ensure your rank list reaches 8 or more programs where you will likely receive interviews.
For a detailed breakdown of signaling strategy, match data, and how to build your rank list, see our full Dermatology Residency Match: Stats, Strategy and How to Match guide.
Frequently Asked QuestionsIs there an official dermatology residency ranking?
No. Unlike medical schools, dermatology residency programs are not officially ranked by any organization. The rankings on this page reflect MedEdits analysis based on NIH departmental funding, program reputation, and applicant match data. They are intended as a strategic guide for applicants, not a definitive assessment of training quality.
What does the Median Step 2 column mean?
It reflects the median Step 2 CK score of applicants who received interview invitations at that program. It is not the score of matched applicants, and it is not a hard cutoff. Programs showing N/A do not publicly report this data.
How many dermatology residency programs are there?
There are 156 ACGME-accredited dermatology residency programs offering PGY-2 positions in the 2026 match. This table covers the 100 most established programs.
How should I use these tiers when building my rank list?
Most applicants should have programs from all three tiers on their rank list. Matched dermatology applicants in 2024 ranked an average of 8.8 programs. If you received 7 or more interview invitations, rank all of them regardless of tier. The NRMP algorithm is applicant-optimal — ranking a program you would accept never hurts your chances at a higher-ranked one.
How often will this page be updated?
This page is updated annually following the release of NRMP Advance Data Tables and Charting Outcomes data. The current rankings reflect 2026 match data and 2024 Charting Outcomes.
Program ranking: MedEdits analysis based on NIH departmental funding (Blue Ridge Institute for Medical Research), Doximity program reputation data, and applicant match outcomes.
Median Step 2 data: based on program-reported data from the 2024–2025 application cycle.
Match outcome data: 2026 NRMP Advance Data Tables.
Applicant characteristic data: 2024 NRMP Charting Outcomes in the Match: Senior Students of U.S. MD Medical Schools.
Jessica Freedman, M.D., is a board-certified emergency physician, former faculty member, medical school admissions committee member, and Associate Residency Director at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. She is the founder and chair of MedEdits Medical Admissions. Since 2007, she has helped thousands of students navigate the medical school admissions and residency match processes, with more than 95% of comprehensive clients gaining acceptance. She is the author of four books on medical admissions and host of The Oath podcast.
6 min read
There is no official ranking of anesthesiology residency programs. Unlike medical schools, anesthesiology residency programs have no equivalent to...
12 min read
Dermatology Residency Match 2026: Stats, Strategy & How to Match Dermatology is one of the smallest and most competitive specialties in medicine....
What are the Best Medical Schools in Texas? Baylor College of Medicine University of Texas Southwestern Medical School Introduction With 16 Texas...